🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.