🔗 Share this article

Within the initial chapters of the book Authentic, speaker Jodi-Ann Burey poses a challenge: commonplace injunctions to “come as you are” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are far from well-meaning invitations for self-expression – they’re traps. Burey’s debut book – a blend of memoir, investigation, societal analysis and conversations – aims to reveal how companies appropriate personal identity, moving the burden of institutional change on to individual workers who are often marginalized.

Career Path and Broader Context

The impetus for the publication stems partly in Burey’s own career trajectory: different positions across business retail, startups and in international development, viewed through her perspective as a woman of color with a disability. The two-fold position that Burey experiences – a push and pull between asserting oneself and aiming for security – is the engine of the book.

It arrives at a time of collective fatigue with organizational empty phrases across the United States and internationally, as resistance to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs mount, and various institutions are scaling back the very systems that earlier assured transformation and improvement. Burey enters that arena to argue that retreating from authenticity rhetoric – specifically, the corporate language that trivializes identity as a grouping of aesthetics, peculiarities and interests, leaving workers concerned with handling how they are seen rather than how they are regarded – is not the answer; instead, we need to reinterpret it on our own terms.

Marginalized Workers and the Performance of Identity

Through detailed stories and conversations, Burey illustrates how underrepresented staff – individuals of color, LGBTQ+ people, female employees, people with disabilities – learn early on to adjust which identity will “fit in”. A sensitive point becomes a disadvantage and people compensate excessively by working to appear palatable. The practice of “presenting your true self” becomes a display surface on which numerous kinds of assumptions are projected: affective duties, sharing personal information and continuous act of appreciation. As the author states, employees are requested to reveal ourselves – but without the safeguards or the trust to withstand what comes out.

According to the author, employees are requested to reveal ourselves – but without the safeguards or the trust to survive what comes out.’

Real-Life Example: The Story of Jason

Burey demonstrates this phenomenon through the account of Jason, a hearing-impaired staff member who took it upon himself to teach his team members about deaf culture and communication practices. His readiness to talk about his life – an act of candor the organization often commends as “genuineness” – briefly made routine exchanges smoother. However, Burey points out, that improvement was fragile. After personnel shifts erased the unofficial understanding Jason had built, the culture of access vanished. “Everything he taught departed with those employees,” he states tiredly. What was left was the weariness of having to start over, of having to take charge for an institution’s learning curve. According to Burey, this demonstrates to be requested to reveal oneself lacking safeguards: to risk vulnerability in a structure that celebrates your openness but fails to institutionalize it into regulation. Genuineness becomes a trap when organizations count on employee revelation rather than institutional answerability.

Literary Method and Notion of Opposition

The author’s prose is at once lucid and lyrical. She combines academic thoroughness with a tone of solidarity: an invitation for audience to participate, to interrogate, to disagree. In Burey’s opinion, workplace opposition is not loud rebellion but ethical rejection – the act of opposing uniformity in settings that require thankfulness for basic acceptance. To resist, in her framing, is to challenge the stories companies describe about justice and belonging, and to decline involvement in customs that maintain unfairness. It might look like naming bias in a discussion, opting out of unpaid “inclusion” work, or establishing limits around how much of oneself is offered to the company. Resistance, Burey indicates, is an affirmation of self-respect in environments that frequently praise compliance. It constitutes a discipline of honesty rather than defiance, a approach of insisting that an individual’s worth is not dependent on institutional approval.

Restoring Sincerity

The author also avoids rigid dichotomies. The book does not simply discard “authenticity” completely: instead, she urges its redefinition. In Burey’s view, authenticity is not the unfiltered performance of character that corporate culture often celebrates, but a more thoughtful correspondence between one’s values and personal behaviors – a principle that opposes manipulation by corporate expectations. Instead of considering sincerity as a directive to disclose excessively or adjust to sterilized models of candor, Burey urges readers to preserve the aspects of it based on truth-telling, personal insight and principled vision. According to Burey, the aim is not to give up on authenticity but to move it – to transfer it from the boardroom’s performative rituals and to relationships and organizations where reliance, fairness and accountability make {